Although I strive to create, and prefer to read, realistic and believable novels, I am not against good unrealistic fiction, the key word being “good.” From Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey to Rowling’s Harry Potter series, many celebrated works of literature are about fantastic and/or unreal stories and characters.
Writers whose only goal is to entertain readers don’t fret about how unreal their characters and plots are, and little, if any, about social context. I don’t pass judgment on them. Neither do I disapprove of those readers who prefer unreal fiction. They read those books to amuse themselves, and maybe to escape from daily grind.
Crime has been the central theme of many novels. Some frown when I argue that Dostoyevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov is a crime novel. For them, great literature and crime are irreconcilable. Admittedly, crime fiction has not been a wellspring of literary excellence, but from among the many thousand of titles published, I guess it wouldn’t be difficult to find a certain amount of admirable books, none of which written by me, I regret to say.
At present the bulk of crime fiction consists of mysteries, thrillers, suspense novels, espionage novels, and police procedurals. They are also sub-classified as hardboiled and softboiled.
I believe that all contemporary writers of fiction share the same aspiration: To pen entertaining novels. But in my formative years I read many authors who had two other objectives: To be realistic, and to make readers reflect about human nature and certain social problems as old as mankind.
Perhaps it is better, to define what I consider unreal crime fiction, to provide a dreadful example.
In certain novels the protagonist is generally in his or her mid-thirties. With different degrees of subtleness the author lets us know that he or she is bright, good looking, sexy, and funny. This admirable specimen is a crack shot, a kung fu expert, drives a sport car, and drinks but never gets drunk. All the gorgeous women or handsome men fall for him or her. A few never age; in the first novel, published, for instance, in the 1980s, they were thirty; fifteen books later they were thirty-two.
Their antagonists are brilliant, well-funded, and terribly resourceful criminals who along three quarters of the novel outwit the main character and escape using all sorts of fast vehicles and top-of-the-line communications and weapons. In the end, the protagonist triumphs.
Thankfully, it seems that this kind of extremely unreal crime novel is less popular than decades earlier, when it sold countless copies. Nowadays unreality in crime fiction books is less bizarre, but equally implausible. It is more common in motion pictures and television serials.
Where I come from, neither life nor crime and criminals are like that.
Having read a fair number of crime novels in my life time, I find that Latin American and Anglo Saxon authors hold opposing views concerning realism. I hope that those of you who study Latin America find a short historical digression interesting.
In the 19th and 20th century the bulk of criminals in South America, Central America and the Caribbean were elected presidents that over the years became corrupt, generals that seized power by force, or revolutionaries that turned into dictators. Their henchmen were Army officers, chiefs of police and espionage corps, congressmen, ministers, and crooked judges. The wealthy courted the favour or bought the support of politicians and government officials to get away with breaking the law.
Depictions of such state of affairs abound in Latin American crime fiction. Our murderers, torturers, embezzlers, and kidnappers are nearly always people in power, or the rich they shield; main characters want to change such reality, although in the end they merely manage to defeat a single bad guy, not the system.
Rarely protagonists are a handsome man or a beautiful woman. They may smoke marijuana or drink hard liquor, but are not proud of it. To escape the oppression and corruption they are immersed in for a few hours, they make love, listen to music, read, and watch sports and movies.
In Latin America, crime fiction became a relatively safe way (we could always say it was fiction) for denouncing the ills of our societies. Readers enjoy seeing our real problems in print and many authors try to be realistic.
The majority of the Latin American novels that I have read are pretty lifelike and strive to reflect our cultures and societies, and also how we see and judge other cultures and societies.
Even in the most realistic novels there is a measure of unreality. Sometimes a character with no street smartness or military experience shoots with amazing precision, or lies too convincingly, or plans something perfectly. Never a punctured tire, a flight delay, a bout of flu, or lack of money prevents the main character from doing something central to the plot just in time. Every so often the protagonist detects an astute criminal by serendipity. But serendipity is part of reality.
As a storyteller, I choose plots based on situations that I know happened or might happen within certain social framework. I create characters with all the contradictions inherent in human nature, and try to make the narrative entertaining.
I fancy my readers as educated and intelligent adults. I suppose they read my novels because they want to entertain themselves but don’t find demons, vampires, and supernatural humans entertaining. Protagonists that are models of perfection or paragons of virtue are not to their liking. They don’t want to be deceived or taken for fools either. I respect those readers that I see in my mind’s eye. I write for those readers.
Nearly all my characters and plots are fictional, but concerning political, economic, and legal issues, and also the descriptions of places, fauna, and flora, I stand by all you find in my novels. To achieve that, I add considerable research to my personal experiences.
The best I can define reality in crime fiction to an aspiring writer is this: Strive to see the world as objectively and realistically as possible and then write about it in an entertaining and reflective way.
Delivered at the Faculty of Latin American Studies, University of Toronto, October 15, 2008.
No Comments